Posts Tagged ‘Joseph Gordon-Levitt’

GOODIES: You call yourself a fan?

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

Loving stuff is fun.  Making clubs are fun.  Getting high and watching ‘Seventeen Again’ on opening night with two other closeted lovers of Zac Efron is really fun.  Organizing such events is why I create and keep up with and recruit members to things I am commonly referring to as ‘Crush Clubs‘.  But there are many designations and I need some help.  Lemme break it down…

First up, the standard ‘Crush Club‘ – so far I have three.  The Channing Tatum Crush Club, or CTCC, counts me and Amanda as members.  The Zac Efron Crush Club, ZECC, includes me, Amanda and Nina officially.  And the Robert Pattinson Crush Club, RPCC, is mainly me and Cindy.  Necessary criteria is pretty simple, they’re cute and talented enough to tolerate watching most films they make.
Picture 3Picture 4Picture 5

I know what you’re thinking, where is Shia LaBeouf??  Well he’s actually an AA – Artist Appreciation. This is a one member club, just me, how sad.  What designates an AA?  It’s kind of a mix of I think they are talented, spunky, I wish them lots of success, and let’s be friends.  It’s more of a nurturing pride for than a crush on.  Joseph Gordon Levitt just earned himself an AA after I finally caught his monologue from SNL.  He’s cute enough for a CC, but far too petite for me.
joeShia-LaBeouf

Next up, a ‘Lust Club‘.  I came up with this because basically Chris Pine needed stronger wording.  He’s got the skillz, the cocky attitude and he looks like this in a beanie:
Picture 2
Can’t even handle it.  CPLC, who’s in?

Here’s where I need your help.  I don’t know if I should throw ladies under the Crush Club and Artist Appreciation banners or if they get their own designations…  I could easily give Emily Blunt and Rachel McAdams their own AA‘s…  It just feels like something’s missing, like they’re not being rewarded enough for their hotness.  Any suggestions?  Fellas??
Picture 2rachel_mcadams-state_of_play-1

And then finally, and this is the most important to me, what do I do about Daniel Day Lewis?  No one comes close to my totally unhealthy love and admiration for this guy.  What do I even title it?  Platinum Idol??  Diamond League?  Ha, the DDLDL.  His Holiness?
Picture 1

I do think I need something for the kind of the older generation of geniuses… Hugh Laurie, Frances McDormand (Erin’s pick)… Where does Paul Rudd fit in?  I have much to figure out.

I’m also considering an Auteur Idol – the director series.

I wanna know who you’d nominate for what and that’s what the comment box is for!!

Name
Email
*leave it blank*
Comment

Do tell!!!

AT FIRST SIGHT: Nolan’s Inception

Monday, August 24th, 2009

nolan

Christopher Nolan – looking awfully intense.

Chris has a pretty damn good track record with me. Of course, my first encounter with him was Memento which was mind-blowing for us all. Then, I had the fortune of discovering his film school shorts in a Criterion collection while attending film school in jolly old England and found Doodlebug – his early mind-teasing product of genius. Look it up if you haven’t seen it yet.

So I’m not too surprised to see that the teaser-trailer for his next movie, Inception, is just as intriguing. Haven’t found an embed-able one yet so check it out on Yahoo trailers here.

While I have only a slight idea on what the storyline is, it SO gives me enough that I want to see it. The only synopsis on IMDB is this: A CEO-type becomes involved in a blackmailing scandal. It does have an amazing cast, as expected, including our dear Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Leonardo DiCaprio, Ellen Page, Marion Cotillard, Cillian Murphy and Michael Caine. Oh I’m all excited now. Chris is making his way into my director hall of fame.

GOODIES: Zooey and Joe dance charmingly. I stare blankly.

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009

Perhaps you’ve seen this video, I’ve noticed some people linking and sharing it, but I’m going to post it anyway so I can get all opinionated at you.

First, watch.
Goodbye forever self starting video.

Now, discuss.

1 – What’s with the introduction?  And why that one cut away?  Look, a side angle!

2- Set looks nice, yes indeed.  But then. 2:23, she takes off his sunglasses, and everyone wonders, why does she take them off like that?

3- This is Zooey’s song from her band She & Him.  That bothers me.  Is that wrong?  I worry I’m getting hater…

4- 1:49, cute.

5- 1:33, this has to be the most awkward edit I’ve ever seen in a music video.  Marc Webb is a veteran music video director.  Unacceptable.

6- 1:25.  UM, WHAT?!?!?!  Why can Joe do a flip / hand spring / whatever that is??  I am SO going to see ‘G.I. Joe’ now.

7- She looks…. cumbersome.  I’m sorry!  I’m not a jealous B, but the lady is no dancer!  I know I know, who cares, cause she looks cute in her headband.

So, fine, write me and tell me I’m wrong to be unimpressed.  It’s just… FINE.  But movieland, don’t you dare overload me and take away the sassy and special sheen that movie provided on its first viewing.  I don’t want to be a part of the backlash!!

THE MORNING AFTER : ‘(500) Days’ Discussed, with spoilers.

Sunday, July 19th, 2009

Here is where we discuss ‘(500) Days of Summer’ – some highs some lows, likes dislikes, etc…..  Then we inanely discuss our rating system.

Capsule reviews for spoiler avoidance:

GRADES: Nina predicted a C+, actual grade: B+.  Angela predicted B+, I’m teetering up to an A-.

RATINGS: Since this is fairly new, we’ve included our ENTIRE discussion on this. Look out for a page that explains these in depth soon enough…

Awww_Icon Awww_Icon Awww_Icon

LOL_Icon LOL_Icon LOL_Icon LOL_Icon

Indie_Icon Indie_Icon Indie_Icon

In short : SEE IT.

500days

nina: ok. so. you ready to rock this review or what?
Angela C:
totally
nina
: k let me find my glasses
nina
: i’m fucking blind…
nina
: so. i fleshed out my issue with the numbers and the time jumping
Angela C:
ok, first remind me of your predict grade and you’re end grade? C to B?
nina
: let’s go with C+ to B+
Angela C:
mmk… I can’t decide if I’m bumping my B+ to an A-, I might be…
nina
: wow
Angela C
: explain your numbers issue.

nina: ok.  i’m ok with time jumping
nina: but my problem is that there was no “present” or anchor or point of reference
nina: like in eternal sunshine or memento
nina: where you always come back to a certain place
nina: with this
nina: (a) you are kind of just floating back and forth
nina: and (b) he references particular days that you’re supposed to remember

Angela C: but I wouldn’t say floating because you do get the feeling of going somewhere, there’s an anticipation.
Angela C: and I think if you just let the vague progression, which they help with the numbers / shade of the background / tree growth etc… you can just let it happen
Angela C: which is kind of hard cause numbers are numbers
Angela C: and for numbery people I imagine it’s like, do the math do the math
Angela C: but I don’t think it has to be that specific

nina: right…it wasn’t a HUGE problem for me, but i would’ve preferred a different device
nina: i wanted to go back to a particular place a little more
nina: so i had a point of reference
nina: but what bumped it up to a B+ was definitely (a) it was fucking hilarious and (b) joseph made it feel totally real
nina: can’t say the same about zooey
Angela C: yeah i have nitpicky things about her character. they just rely on her big eyes and bangs
Angela C: but when she’s like ‘he could be a really great architect if he wanted to be…’
Angela C: i’m like ‘ and what do you do, bitch?’

nina: right?! and she’s ALWAYS some larger than life crazy girl that comes in and is wacky and they fall in love with her wackiness
Angela C: she has no real meat to her besides the obvious charmy charm
Angela C: which really is a writer’s problem
nina: i wonder if it’s because she can’t do normal
Angela C: such a dude perspective
Angela C: like, he doesn’t even care, cause of those blue eyes! and they both like the Smiths!

nina: hahaha yea – and i love how that’s the music they like
nina: and all we get is regina spektor
nina: like um…maybe we should be hearing the smiths?
nina: another writer’s flaw i think
Angela C: smiths was a weird choice to me
Angela C: but that’s always a problem with movies that are playing to an indie / hip sensibility
Angela C: people are sooooo particular (people, read: me.)

nina: and when they’re in the bar and he’s talking about the way women dress?
nina: what the fuck was that?
Angela C: that conversation was too real to me, he’s just trying to think of something to say
Angela C: he’s all lost cause she’s being distant I think
nina: i really loved him in this
nina: i was impartial and now i’ve turned
nina: he did really well at being someone i knew
Angela C: he MADE the movie, would have been a meltdown otherwise
nina: like i wanted to shove her out of the way and be like NO date me…ME!!!
Angela C: ha… you’re waving your hands ‘yoohoooo’
nina: exactly!

Angela C: i wonder if they stuck Autumn in the background of any scenes…..
nina: yea i wanted to watch it again cause of that
Angela C: ok, well, as a kind of wrap up, i was thinking about it last night, and regardless of the little issues it’s definitely a special movie
nina: yes, overall like
Angela C: A.O. Scott actually words it:
Angela C: “So a winsome, accessible movie about more-or-less recognizable young people navigating the murky waters of post-sexual-revolutionary, midrecessionary heterosexual attraction has a novelty and a measure of bravery working in its favor, whatever its shortcomings. And “(500) Days” finds just the right scale and tone, neither trivializing nor melodramatically overstating the delicate feelings it explores.”

nina: nice.
Angela C:
fuck him and his good ass writing
nina: hahahhaha
Angela C:
heehee.
nina: time to rate.  what categories should we use?
Angela C: we need a good indie rating

nina: oh! also – such a great relief from judd apatow
nina: had to say it
Angela C: yeah that’s what Scott was referencing- allow another cut and paste
Angela C: “But it is, all the same, a fairly pointed response to the sorry state of romantic comedy in Hollywood, which runs the gamut from gauzily implausible fantasy to blatant and fatuous dishonesty, with an occasional detour into raunchy humor. The governing commercial calculus these days seems to be that dudes want smut, ladies want weddings, and a picture (like “The Hangover,” say) that delivers both will make the audience happy and the studios rich.”
nina: ha yes

nina: so we need an indie icon
Angela C: yes, but a good one
nina: and i think we need a ‘laugh out loud’ icon
nina: cause i was doing plenty of that
Angela C: yes, and something that conjures ‘awwwww’
Angela C: I was thinking we could have a 10 rating and then fill it however.
Angela C: like 4 good indies, 3 awws, 3 lols.  ya know?
Angela C: and if a movie sucked it could be like 8 poops and 2 tampons
nina: hahahah wow that is a crappy movie
Angela C: hahahaha, right? 8 poops is a lot of poops
nina: but we digress
nina: ok so how do we visualize these indies, awwws and lols

Angela C: hmmm, a good indie …………
nina: is it fair to say that indie = lo budg?
Angela C: um, no, indie = hip
nina: ok so hip = …
Angela C: and also low budg… but more hip…
Angela C: like bad / cliche icons might be – raybans, flannel, skinny jeans, certain haircuts, beards….
nina: ok…cup of coffee?
Angela C: that kind of works, it would have to be Intelligentsia, it’s hip but it’s also GOOOOOOOD
nina: right. we could do that
Angela C: you can make an intelligentsia coffee cup icon?
nina: yes.  for sure.
nina: and awww?
nina: so cute aww or sad aww?
nina: cause i felt both
Angela C: both
Angela C: a sick kitten
nina: that’s horrific

Angela C: charming heartbreak. how do you personify??
nina: argh
nina: ok what if we go to LOL first
Angela C: well maybe just a laughing emoticon
Angela C: with a bubble ‘lol’
nina: ok
nina: damn now we’re back to awww
nina: shit. i don’t know
nina: joseph gordon levitt heads?
Angela C: yeah just do that
Angela C: he deserves to be a part of the rating

DATING: Mean Magazine and Cinemash

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

Well, shoot, how fun is this?

LA Times says:

In short videos, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Zooey Deschanel, Channing Tatum, Will Arnett and Cheech and Chong, among others, are re-imagining some of the films they love, with a twist and shout-out.

“It’s kind of like watching a movie and having it derail in your own head,” says Kashy Khaledi, whose Mean magazine has joined with Microsoft’s Zune to put together the new Web series “Cinemash.”

As reigning member of the CTCC (the Channing Tatum Crush Club) I am most excited about the Dirty Dancing webisode featuring him and Charlyne Yi.  And also curious if it will turn my opinion on Ms. Yi, cause really how bad does Paper Heart look?  Just ask Nina. Picture 2

Picture 3Here is the first post featuring the always adorable Joseph Gordon-Levitt and the maybe-waning-but-still-cute Zooey Deschanel as the flipped title characters from Sid and Nancy.

And here is the release date page for all the webisodes.

I love shit like this.